RESEARCH, WITH CONTEXT

ForcusGenius™ Clinical Evidence

Study summaries, findings and original sources.

Listed articles provide independent scientific context. Product-specific clinical efficacy has not been verified in the supplied material.

2 articles Selected Research · Reviewed November 2026
2020Randomized trial
Independent field evidenceADHD · Independent digital intervention

Kollins SH et al. · The Lancet Digital Health

A randomized controlled trial of the AKL-T01 digital intervention in children with ADHD. It provides a reference for attention-focused digital intervention design and clinical evaluation.

Evidence scope: This study evaluates AKL-T01, a different product. Its results and authorization cannot be transferred to ForcusGenius™.

DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30017-0

Published article Repository PDF
ForcusGenius™
2015Meta-analysis
Independent field evidenceADHD · Cognitive-training research

Cortese S et al. · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

This meta-analysis found gains in targeted working-memory performance, with limited effects on ADHD symptoms in blinded ratings. It helps define appropriate outcome measures for cognitive training.

Evidence scope: Background evidence across other interventions. Improvements on trained tasks should not be equated with broad clinical benefit or a ForcusGenius™ treatment effect.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2014.12.010

Published article Full Text and PDF Access
ForcusGenius™